Zuckerberg Live Internal Conference: The Billionaire phenomenon is unreasonable, but it may be the best solution
1About internal leaks: The leak may be an intern, and the leak is shocking the company, but the company supports everything he said in the leaked audio.
2Open Letter to the US Attorney General: Social networks must have a good grasp between protecting user privacy and ensuring public safety.
3Regarding the EU judgment: Europe’s ruling on the removal of offensive content on a global scale is a “disturbing precedent”.
4About the huge wealth of billionaires: To some extent, this is unfair, but it may be the best solution, better than other programs.
According to foreign media reports, earlier this week, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg responded to the company’s employee issues in the internal audio of the Q&A conference that was leaked to the media. In response, Zuckerberg made a public broadcast of this week’s Q&A session to pre-empt and prevent further leaks.
Zuckerberg talked about the possible identity of the leaker and talked about the fact that billionaires should not exist.
Earlier this week, the media released an internal audio conference on Facebook’s previous internal meeting. Zuckerberg’s anti-vibration plan surfaced. These meetings are usually only attended by company employees. The audio provides a rare opportunity to see how Zuckerberg talks to his colleagues, as well as how the company discusses regulatory issues and competitors’ vibrato.
Read More: Best Android Phone With Snapdragon 835
Facebook’s top-secret meeting recording exposure: Zuckerberg against the vibrato plan surfaced
Zuckerberg’s response to the leak was to “advertise” the audio on his Facebook public page, claiming that if you want to know the company’s situation “as is”, you should listen to this audio.
Later this Thursday, he simply broadcast live on the latest internal Q&A conference.
On Thursday afternoon, Zuckerberg kicked off the meeting with the applause of the audience.
“Don’t applaud, you guys have never drummed before,” he said with a smile. “Don’t just applaud because we are going to live this week.”
In an hour-long meeting, Zuckerberg talked about the work of the week and answered questions from employees.
The five highlights of the live broadcast of this conference are as follows:
1. He said that an intern was leaked to the media before.
Zuckerberg first talked about the leak. He said that the leak was “very disappointing.”
Zuckerberg said: “We think it’s an intern because it’s an intern Q&A meeting, so I didn’t send the audio to the whole company.” Zuckerberg said the leak was very internal. Shock. But the company supports everything he said in the leaked audio.
“We originally believed what we said at the meeting,” he said.
2. He admits that he is very similar to “robot” in an interview.
Another reason for Zuckerberg’s live Q&A conference is that it may be better than his interview.
“I may be the least likely to be good at interviews,” he admitted, often acknowledging his style of speech in the interview. “I feel like a robot in my interview,” he said.
He said that prompted him to try live weekly Q&A meetings. “I was very bad in the interview, too cautious,” he said.
3. He mentioned the open letter of the Attorney General, William Barr, about end-to-end encryption.
According to sources on Thursday, Justice Barr wrote a letter to Facebook asking the company to postpone the plan to end-to-end encryption and self-delete messages. Barr’s view is that this function may make it more difficult to enforce law enforcement against terrorism and child sexual exploitation.
Zuckerberg announced in March that Facebook will integrate all the communication services on Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp and end-to-end encrypt them.
Zuckerberg said: “I don’t intend to talk about this in detail, but this is one of the core issues we face.” He points to the need for social networks to be good at protecting user privacy and ensuring public safety.
He said: “We have made a lot of efforts in this area. By trying to detect the pattern of activities, by detecting upstream bad activities, by linking accounts together, we can do a lot of things, so that we can know that someone is on Facebook. Do something bad, even if we don’t see the content.”
4. Zuckerberg said that Europe’s ruling on the removal of offensive content on a global scale is a “disturbing precedent”.
The European Court of Justice ruled on Thursday that EU member states could force Facebook to remove content that they ruled illegal, not just within their own country. The ruling will have a huge impact on Facebook’s remarks.
Zuckerberg said the ruling was a “very disturbing precedent” given the different laws of different countries on freedom of expression. He said: “Many details of how this plan will be implemented will depend on the courts of European countries.”
He said that Facebook had encountered such a situation before, some governments tried to move the content out of the country, but the company “successfully fought against them.”
He said: “I think we and other service companies will file a lawsuit and figure out what it means for a long time.” He explained that although Facebook does not have the opportunity to appeal, it can affect the interpretation of the ruling.
5. Zuckerberg said that some billionaires may have too much money. (Zuckerberg ranks fifth in the Bloomberg Billionaires Index with a net worth of $69.4 billion.)
Last week, an engineer asked Zuckerberg about Bernie Sanders’s statement that billionaires should not exist.
Zuckerberg’s point of view seems to be liberal, and he believes that the rich, not the government, should decide how their billions of dollars will be spent.
Zuckerberg said: “I know why Sanders thinks so. I don’t know the exact threshold of ‘how much a person should have.’ But from a certain perspective, no one should have that much money.”
“I do think that some wealth is unreasonable,” he said. He mentioned the charity event with his wife, Priscilla Chen. However, he argues that allowing billionaires to donate to charities may be better than all publicly allocated spending by the government – he believes the government may lack innovation.
“In a way, this is unfair, but it may be the best solution, better than other programs,” he said. (Tencent Technology Review / Kathy)